Both Asteraceae

Ericameria nauseosa vs Lepidospartum squamatum

These two are not on this page because a keyword tool suggested them. They are here because our own identification model genuinely mistook one for the other, on real photographs, 10 times. We publish the rate, and then we tell you what actually separates them.

Confused 10x by our model Method published

Side by sidefigs. a and b

Ericameria nauseosa, photographed by Shane Johnson
fig. a Shane Johnson, CC0 1.0

Ericameria nauseosa

Rubber Rabbitbrush
Lepidospartum squamatum, photographed by velodrome
fig. b velodrome, CC BY 4.0

Lepidospartum squamatum

California Broomsage

How often our model gets it wrong measured, not estimated

When the plant was The model said How often
Ericameria nauseosa Lepidospartum squamatum 10 of 20 (50%)

The confusion runs one way only. The model mistakes Ericameria nauseosa for Lepidospartum squamatum, but not the reverse.

Measured on 38,299 openly licensed, research-grade photographs. Full method and dataset.

What actually separates themon the record

Family Both Asteraceae. The family does not separate them.
Genus Ericameria versus Lepidospartum.
Flowering Peaks in September versus October. If the plant is in flower, timing helps. (n = 2,933 and 615.)

What we do not have yet: the diagnostic morphological character that a botanist would key on, from a source we can cite. We are not going to invent one. Until we have it, this page tells you the two are genuinely confusable, how often, and what the taxonomy and the flowering data do and do not settle.

Both recordsfull pages