Rubiaceae and Nothofagaceae
Coprosma rhamnoides vs Nothofagus solandri
These two are not on this page because a keyword tool suggested them. They are here because our own identification model genuinely mistook one for the other, on real photographs, 3 times. We publish the rate, and then we tell you what actually separates them.
Confused 3x by our model Method published
Side by sidefigs. a and b
Coprosma rhamnoides
Twiggy coprosma
Nothofagus solandri
New Zealand Black Beech
How often our model gets it wrong measured, not estimated
| When the plant was | The model said | How often |
|---|---|---|
| Nothofagus solandri | Coprosma rhamnoides | 3 of 20 (15%) |
Measured on 38,299 openly licensed, research-grade photographs. Full method and dataset.
What actually separates themon the record
| Family | Rubiaceae versus Nothofagaceae. Different families, which is a real separation. |
|---|---|
| Genus | Coprosma versus Nothofagus. |
| Flowering | Peaks in September versus October. If the plant is in flower, timing helps. (n = 96 and 32.) |
What we do not have yet: the diagnostic morphological character that a botanist would key on, from a source we can cite. We are not going to invent one. Until we have it, this page tells you the two are genuinely confusable, how often, and what the taxonomy and the flowering data do and do not settle.