Both Convolvulaceae

Calystegia macrostegia vs Convolvulus arvensis

These two are not on this page because a keyword tool suggested them. They are here because our own identification model genuinely mistook one for the other, on real photographs, 11 times. We publish the rate, and then we tell you what actually separates them.

Confused 11x by our model Method published

Side by sidefigs. a and b

Calystegia macrostegia, photographed by Millie Basden
fig. a Millie Basden, CC BY 4.0

Calystegia macrostegia

coast morning glory
Convolvulus arvensis, photographed by Ian Wolfe
fig. b Ian Wolfe, CC0 1.0

Convolvulus arvensis

field bindweed

How often our model gets it wrong measured, not estimated

When the plant was The model said How often
Calystegia macrostegia Convolvulus arvensis 11 of 20 (55%)

The confusion runs one way only. The model mistakes Calystegia macrostegia for Convolvulus arvensis, but not the reverse.

Measured on 38,299 openly licensed, research-grade photographs. Full method and dataset.

What actually separates themon the record

Family Both Convolvulaceae. The family does not separate them.
Genus Calystegia versus Convolvulus.
Flowering Peaks in April versus June. If the plant is in flower, timing helps. (n = 1,255 and 21,884.)

What we do not have yet: the diagnostic morphological character that a botanist would key on, from a source we can cite. We are not going to invent one. Until we have it, this page tells you the two are genuinely confusable, how often, and what the taxonomy and the flowering data do and do not settle.

Both recordsfull pages