Asplenium polyodon vs Icarus filiformis
These two are not on this page because a keyword tool suggested them. They are here because our own identification model genuinely mistook one for the other, on real photographs, 3 times. We publish the rate, and then we tell you what actually separates them.
Side by sidefigs. a and b
Asplenium polyodon
Icarus filiformis
How often our model gets it wrong measured, not estimated
| When the plant was | The model said | How often |
|---|---|---|
| Asplenium polyodon | Icarus filiformis | 3 of 19 (16%) |
The confusion runs one way only. The model mistakes Asplenium polyodon for Icarus filiformis, but not the reverse.
Measured on 38,299 openly licensed, research-grade photographs. Full method and dataset.
What actually separates themon the record
| Family | Aspleniaceae versus Blechnaceae. Different families, which is a real separation. |
|---|---|
| Genus | Asplenium versus Icarus. |
What we do not have yet: the diagnostic morphological character that a botanist would key on, from a source we can cite. We are not going to invent one. Until we have it, this page tells you the two are genuinely confusable, how often, and what the taxonomy and the flowering data do and do not settle.